1940 Epi Blondes flyer

Close-up #52: Blond archtops
– how rare are they really?

When vintage archtop guitars with a natural or "blond" finish are offered for sale, descriptions often claim that examples in this finish are "rare" – or "much rarer" than those with a sunburst finish. Of course, sellers usually play the "rarity" card to justify a higher price...

This made me wonder: How rare are blond Epiphone archtops really? How do the numbers of natural finish examples compare to sunburst versions of the same models?

As always with pre-Gibson Epiphone instruments, no official production figures are known to have survived. So, the best we can do to get at least a rough idea is to dive into our Registry database which has documented several thousands of surviving instruments.

When extracting and comparing figures about guitar finishes, we have to consider a few points such as:

Ivory blond Epiphone archtops
Meeting of Epiphone Triumphs from the 1940s, all with ivory blond finish: Peter Jung, Graham Tichy, Don Young.


The data

The charts below list figures for documented examples of models that were available with a blond finish (data as of 26 January 2026):

Acoustic archtop
Blackst
Broadw
Broadw
Cut
DeLuxe 
DeLuxe
Cut
Devon 
Emp 
Sunb intro
1933 1931 1949 1931 1949 1949 1935
Blond intro
1940 1940 1949 1939 1949 1952 1939
Blond
optional
  81
 41
 10
 67
 15  11
 87
Sunburst
optional
 122
 78
 13
 48
 9  28
 84
Sunburst
total
 185
 183    128
 2
 71
 111
Not known
 51
 79
 5
 52
 26  10
 53

Acoustic
archtop
Emperor
Cut
Ritz 
Spartan
Triumph 
Triumph
Cut
Zenith 
Sunb intro
1949  – 1935 1931 1949 1931
Blond intro
1949 1940 1940 1940 1949 1949
Blond
optional
 27
 48
 22
 154
 54  42
Sunburst
optional
 12
 –  33
 203
 73  94
Sunburst
total
 
 –  65  369
 
 354
Not known
 9
 –  23
 139
 20  122

Electric
archtop

Century
Volpe
Zephyr
Zephyr
Cut 

Zephyr
DeLuxe
Zephyr
DeLuxe
Cut
Zeph
Emp 
Sunb intro
1939 1955 1946 1950 1946 1948 1951
Blond intro
1953 1955 1939 1952 1939 1948 1951
Blond
total
 
 
 157
 
 56  
 
Blond
optional
 44  4  75
 48  51  126  59
Sunburst
optional
 40
 16
 52  50
 40  49
 50
Sunburst
total
 133
     93
 
 
 
Not known
 35
 3
 35
 40
 13  53
 27

Explanation of terms used in the charts:

Note: The figures highlighted bold italic in the charts represent the higher value in the comparison between blonds and sunbursts from the period when both were an option.


What do the figures show?

When comparing the "total" figures for each model, we mostly count more sunbursts than blonds – which is no surprise: The blond option typically only became available years after the launch of the "regular" sunburst version, and therefore had a shorter production period.

But the figures get really interesting when comparing periods when both a blond and sunburst finish option was offered for the respective model. The results in a nutshell:



1954 Epi catalog
Page from the 1954 Epiphone catalog: For the Zenith, the blond finish came with a $15 upcharge – more than 10% of the price! For the Emperor Electric the difference was $25 – less than 5% of the price.


Did the higher prices for the blond option affect sales?


It looks like the blond versions of Epiphone's acoustic and electric archtops sold pretty well – despite their higher catalog price! Note that there was an upcharge of $10–25 for blond finish, varying by model and period. Especially with the fancy DeLuxe + Emperor models, blonds (after becoming available) sold better than sunburst examples. We guess that the price difference – which was only a few percent for the more expensive Epiphones – wasn't that big of an issue for customers in this high-end segment.

With lower models however, the situation was rather different: Here the upcharge for blond finish was relatively high – up to 10% or more of the instrument price! We assume that such a price difference was significant – and potentially a deal-breaker – for many buyers of cheaper instruments who typically were more budget-oriented. This may explain why lower-end Epiphone archtops generally sold better in the cheaper sunburst versions. Still, considering their pricing disadvantage, the numbers of blond lower-end instruments actually seem remarkably high.  


Conclusion: Blonds are nice, but hardly rare


Even though the documented examples in our research database represent only a fraction of the total production, our figures seem solid enough to draw some conclusions: The often-heard claim that blond archtops are "much rarer" than sunbursts is a bit of a myth – at least when talking about pre-1957 Epiphones.

Sure, until the late 1930s blonds were virtually non-existant. But when looking at archtops from the 1940–50s, the blond model versions were far from "rare" – and definitely not so with high-end instruments: Our figures suggest that some of these are actually less common in the sunburst version.

Well, personally we think the "rarity" factor is anyway often somewhat overemphasized in the vintage guitar market. Most important is that we like an instrument: Yes, blond archtops tend to show spectacular woods and look stunning – regardless of rarity. That said, a perfectly applied sunburst finish is a true art in its own right and such a classic look. But most importantly: Both can play and sound equally great.

Epis group

(January 26, 2026 – with later updates)